Original Research Article I Volume 5 I Issue 3 I 2017

Validation of echocardiography as predictor of fluid responsiveness in critically ill septic patients

Suzy Fawzy, Mervat M. Khalaf, Alsayed R. Saadah, Adel Y. Alsis, Sheirf Mokhtar

Biolife; 2017, 5(3), pp 383-387

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7371269

Abstract:

Background: Dynamic parameters have recently replaced static measures which failed to accurately predict fluid responsiveness (FR) in critically ill patient .Transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) can be used to non- invasively assess two dynamic parameters to predict fluid responsiveness, subaortic velocity time integral variations (ΔVTI) and respiratory variations of inferior vena-caval diameter (ΔIVCD).

Keywords:

Septic shock; Fluid challenge; Fluid responsiveness; TTE

References:

  1. Barbier C, Loubieres Y et al.(2004) Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients Intensive Care Medicine :30(9):1740-6.
  2. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. (2004) The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med : 30:1834-1837.
  3. Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL.(2006) How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted? Crit Care :10(4):R102.
  4. Michard F, Teboul JL.(2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence .Chest:121:2000-10.
  5. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al.(2005) Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med:31: 1195 -2001.
  6. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, et al.(2015)  Trial of early goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med : 10:1056.
  7. Muller L, Toumi M et al.(2011) An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology:115:541-7.
  8. Myburgh JA.(2011) Fluid  resuscitation in acute illness-time to reappraise the basics. N Engl J Med : 364: 2543-2544 .
  9. Shankar Hari M, Phillips G et al.(2016) Assessment of definition and clinical criteria for septic shock. JAMA :315(8):775-87.
  10. Sateesh Pujari, & Estari Mamidala. (2015). Anti-diabetic activity of Physagulin-F isolated from Physalis angulata fruits. The American Journal of Science and Medical Research, 1(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.735230
  11. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul J et al.(2002) Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: A new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol : 283:H1729 –33.
  12. Thiele RH, Bartels K, Gan TJ.(2015) Cardiac output monitoring: a contemporary assessment and review. Crit Care Med :43:177–85....

Article Dates:

Received: 4 July 2017; Accepted: 29 August 2017; Published: 5 September 2017

How To Cite:

Suzy Fawzy, Mervat M. Khalaf, Alsayed R. Saadah, Adel Y. Alsis, & Sheirf Mokhtar. (2022). Validation of echocardiography as predictor of fluid responsiveness in critically ill septic patients. Biolife, 5(3), 583–587. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7371269

Download Full Paper: PDF
Submit Manuscript
Join as Reviewer / Editor

Logo


Logo